Alford Plea

Given the mounting evidence that has been made public over the past several weeks (and understanding fully that there is much, much more that will not be released until trial) - I’m curious how many folks think BK would accept an Alford Plea if it meant taking the death penalty off the table.

On the one hand, he has been adamant in his plea of innocence from the start. His narcissistic personality traits lead me to believe that he is confident he will achieve a not guilty verdict, and thus, get away with murder. While much of what we speculate to know about BK is just that - speculation - I do believe there is some merit to the notion that BK lacks some of the socio-situational awareness that would prompt others to take a good deal when they see one. But, I also believe AT would push him to accept an Alford Plea if it were presented by the State.

On the other hand, the evidence is damning, and what we have seen is just the tip of the iceberg. His own attorney is opening the door for appeal on the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel by filing motions that explicitly state that she does not have the time or resources to adequately prepare for trial. I don’t believe she will prevail on these motions, and I don’t think she does either.

I fully believe that the state and the victims’ families want a trial and will not offer a plea deal for a lesser charge. However, the Alford Plea would allow BK to maintain his declaration of innocence, even while pleading guilty to the current charges - thus giving the State a technical win AND (in most cases) waiving his right to appeal.

With his life on the line and as trial looms closer, I’m curious to hear your thoughts on whether you believe BK would accept an Alford Plea if it were offered.

Personally, I would hope it is not offered and that trial proceeds as scheduled. I’m currently wracking my brain trying to figure out how to get 3 months off work to watch the trial livestream in real time (a girl can dream).